Deontologyf part. I, chap. xiv ; vol. I, p

77. DeonUÀogy, part, i, chap. 1 ; vol. I, p. 19. — Cf. Consi. Code^ introduction ; Bowring, vol. IX, pp. 5-6 ; — Book of FallacieSj part V, chap. m ; Bowring, vol. II, p. 475 ; — SophUmes PoUiiqueSj part. IV, chap. i, p. 228 ; et Pairliamentary History and Reviewj containing reports of the proceedings of the two houses of Parliament during the session of 1825 : 6 Geo. IV wilh critical remarks on the principal measures of the sesftion, London, 1827, p. 2, préface (est-elle de Bingham ?) : Imagine that condition of things, in which not the principle of self-interest, but itJ opposite, — the préférence of the public good to priva te — »hould generally obtain : the conséquence is as absurd in supposition as it would be disastroos in reality. « Every man shift for ail the rest, and let no man take.care for himself », says the drunken sailor in Shakespeare's Tempest.