ARNO

À re axé

PL ll ts \e

LT dt ni e

gb 0e Melle gere ti" NS out VS Lin

BORN PS TR AMEN ENCRES ER r pOR

DES ÉTABLISSEMENTS DE FAMILLE EN ANGLETERRE 519 HowaveWhitield em... 263 | Norfolk’s (Duke of) Case. 221, 357, Humberston v. Humberston..... 359 363, 364, 365

NOÉ TOMETe) En de use 463 P Ingram v. Ingram........ 263, 264 Parker’s Settled Estates, Parker J VAPATKET (NC) Tee 463, 481 ; PATES ESRI OW NE R der 273 Jarson v. Wright. RS Ne 151 PStmanv=Harland::... 27. 419 Jennor and Hardie’s Case...... 259. = pas + Brown 299, 293, 283, 361, 362 Josephav-2l0yOonS eee tre PLU AR us D ne MUC 147 POITORISACASEEL ATARI MEN 358 K Pilcher v. Rawlins............. 246 ; ] RP QPelNA ms. Er ee 268 Kmev.-Mellinp rs. enr 265 Portington’s (Mary) Case... 357 L Purefroy v. Rogers. 214, 227, 228, 237, 283, 443 Pursionwe vAParKere nee ee 222 Lampet’s Case ............... 222 AO M CCE en One CCE 232 Leigh’s Settled Estates (in re). 462, Leventhorpe v. Ashbie...... 58, 100 R Lewis Bowles’s Case....... red Liefe v. Saltingstone.......... 259 nos v. Long............ 212, 233 Lingeniv Savrays.-.....:2#. 320 | Robson, Douglass v. Douglas (re) ee PO d Caro uns mes 267 Rochefoucauld v. Boustead..... 237 Poctonc va loetOn-e. cent en 268 | Roddy v. Fitzgerald EE PAPE LE Cubwaich v. Mibbone =. 2.0. 192 | Rudhall v. Milward............ 357 M S Manning”’s Case ..7...... 1222, 315 | Sackville v: Dobson........... 362 Marlborough (Duke of) v. Godol- Sambach v. Dalton........ 198, 199 DRLNEME. Creer Aeoucec 360 |"Saundersiv. .Cormsh........". 362 Massingberd v. Ash .......... 2042 SCatterevod-VARdge. ne. 367 Midmay’s Case... 111, 219, 356, 357 | Scholastica’s Case ............ 357 Millar v. Taylor ee SN CN TOR) ESCTONLS ET SSCTOPES ner 274 Sir Moyle Finch’s Case........ 197 | Shelley’s (Rule in) Case. 42, 83, 127, Moyle v. Moyle............... 328 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 150, Moore Rare) nr RER. LL 370 151, 215, 352, 443 Mundy and Roper’s Contraet (re) 384 | Smith v. Warren........ HORS 222 SHHbhev-eWheoler: "rte 266 N ESOMEÉSMQ TETE) Serres ces ce de 275 Sorden and Alexander’s Contract INA (Te) AR Re ne ee 359, 360 (OMR L on E due do DOTE 325 NEA ELETPOTEPETET RON 455 | Staines v. Maddox......::..... 367

516 LE DÉVELOPPEMENT HISTORIQUE Stephens v. Stephens........... 366 V SuLiISOn -V.- Deal... 264 | Yane v. Lord Barnard......... 292 Vatcher.v: Paull... 1... 274 T W Waldo v. Walde........4.... 293 Tayilonavee Bild ere ent 566 J':Walker (re) RSR Ne CT 314 DAVIS HA MOREL ee eee 470 |: Warner v. Hardwins.....:1... 266 Thellusson v. Woodford ....... 368 Warren (re) tests Mn ss 458, 461 Thomlinson v. Dighton....:.. .… 259 | Welden v. Elkington........... 221 Thompson v. Leach........ 213, 214 ! Witham v. Bland..:..... 40 272 Throckmerton v. Tracy......... 133 | Wood-v:Saunders.. : NN « 363 IpErel CASE MERE ER 196, 198 | Woodiff v. Drurys. "0," 219