SALE OF MOVABLES.—EVIDENCE

SUPERIOR COURT, IN REVIEW, Montreal, 30th april 1872.

Coram BERTHELOT, J., TORRANCE, J., and MACKAY, J. NICHOLS vs HIAS.

Held : That the sale of greenbacks, to be delivered in future, can be proved by admissions on faits et articles and without any previous writing. Mackay, J., dissenting, (2 R. C., 475),

SHERIFF.—RESPONSIBILITY.

SUPERIOR COURT, IN REVIEW, Montreal, 30th september 1872, Coram BERTHELOT, J., TORRANCE, J., and MACKAY, J. McDoNALD vs TACHÉ.

A sheriff, acting under special instructions from the counsel of a seizing creditor, and without malice, seized the land of several parties, not parties in the case, Oppositions were made and were all maintained with costs :

Held : That the sheriff was responsible to the seizing creditor for

these costs. (2 R. C., 475).