CESSION DE BIENS

Court 06 KINGS BENCH, Montreal, ISIS, Present : PYKE, J.

GATES cl al, vs ANOTHER,

Held: That an ussiygnment of bankrupt estate vests in the assign ees, who may bring action thereon in their own name without 1 tice ; that no notice of assignment is necessary, when debt remai due and not attached by other creditors, even on common assignments, (1) (3 KR, L.,456 ; 1 R, C., 481.)

DECRET.—OPPOSITION A FIN DE DISTRAIRE.--ENCHERISSEUR. Court 0F KINGS BENCH, Montreal, 1828. OLIVIER v8 BELANGER.

Held: On an opposition à fin de distraire, filed on the ground that the only bidders were the crier and the bailiff: thatthe sale must have been made, or a new writ issued, and that defendant had no

right to complain of there being no bidders, as he could have procured them.

PER CURIAM: Sale must have been made, or a new writ issued, Plaintiff had a right to bid either for himself or ar other, and the saisi had no right to complain, if there are bidders ; he should have procured them. There is no necessity that there should be there, two or more than one, if no friend appears. Opposition dismissed. (3 R. L., 457 ; 1 R.C, 481.)