DATE

ISG9, , Cour btenir ncCiers s COl:- S69, ni nt été depuis l'LUX.

LSSI er years JPpPOose ler, he

since cts, he ‘n up rce, it nt for

OT ler-

pay Thomas et al, the costs of their contestation; and the court, considering that petitioner has not proved the allewations of his petition and the admissions of the contestants cannot help him in his principal demand ; considering that, at date of the cession, alleged by him, made in october 1869, he was not a trader, Within the meaning of the insolvent act of 1869, sanely interpreted, that, consequently, said cession made by him was idle, and of no use to get for him a discharge, under insolvent act of 1869 ; and that, by no law, do?s he show and prove himself entitled to a discharge ; considering that Villeneuve is not entitled to à discharge as clauned, the court rejects said petition.” (1) (3 R. L., 442 et 519: 2 R. C., 108 et 233.)

GIROUARD et DuGASs, avocats du failli.

DUHAMEL et RAINVILLE, avocats de Thomas et al, contestants,