EE 4 SR
2e Bi0
session of the ‘“prohibited articles at an unlawful hour of the night” Mr. Willan moved to stay judgment on the ground that the words amounted to an acquittal as there was no ‘“unlawful hour of the night” in Canada and the words “ pro.
hibited articles” could not be taken aa
the equivalent of ‘“ burglarious instru.Mfn
ments.” It was held so. W
Mr. Willan’s ready command of invec.
tive was instance, amongst others, by
the following : —
During the progress of a trial, a wit ness told Mr. Willan that he (witnesi
was ‘‘ not the sort of man he took hi
for.” “IT see very well” said the learne barrister, ‘what sort of man you art for you have the seven deadly sins 0 your countenance and the brand of Cal
on your villainous brow.”
les at an r. Willan
e ground
acquittal, ur of the
rds ‘* pro- | , taken as admitted : no taint of Negro, Indian, Chi-
“Only those of Aryan blood are to be
us instru-Mnese or any other blood must be in the
would-be members,” says a paper which
lhave before me entitled ‘“ Constitution id of invet-
and Preamble, Society of Aryan-America.” others, D}
Persons acquainted with physical sci-
. , Mnce asthesame paper rightly asserts,must rial, a wi Le (witness
Enow how much the blood of an inferior
Mace mixed with that of a higher one ree took hi
à the learnt
an you aft dly sins 0 There is no doubt whatever in my mind,
uces the fine standard of Aryan intel-
gence and levels purity to mediocrity.
and of Ca owing as well as I do the gentleman of hom [ am writing, that his ancestors
left the eastern shores ofthe Atlantic for this continent resolved to maintain the above-mentioned purity in an orderly condition.
The only mixture of race in Mr. Wil.
lan, as I have stated in chapter I, is that of the Anglo-Saxon with the French; and
consequentiy he is gifted with something
of the good, and I suppose has somethingk y of the bad qualities of both the Anglo-i:
Saxon and the French-Canadian. in
For instance, he is, after the English
manner, as curt and independent with
those he is not well acquainted with or
does not care for, as he is, after the
French habit, polite and suave with the
persons he knows well and has in regard
To illustrate his naturally exemplifyin®}o
a British trait of character the two follow
you ing short narrations of him will assist :
Jantic for tain the
derly con-
Mr. Wil- . J, is that ench; and something something he Angloan.
he English
ndent witili
ed with of s, after the ve with the
AS in regard
xemplifyinf
two follow
il assist :
One day a very wealthy gentleman, fishing for cheap law, as wealthy men sometimes do, asked a question (involving the construction of a recent act of parliament) of our learned legal friend, and receiving for answer that ‘he had not read the act,” thought to achieve the object by friendly ‘“chaff” and said,—‘ What, call yourself a lawyer and not read that!” He immediately got this answer : “If you were
[in the dock for felony, as I have seen bet-
ter men, and [ any way interested for the prosecution, I would precious soon let you know whether I was a lawyer or not.”
Mr. Willan, being seated apart, on a bench otherwise unoccupied, on board a steamboat, wrapped up ‘in his own houghts, was suddenly addresssd by a young Anglican divine with whom he had
0 previous acquaintance and who, coming
up to him, abruptly asked: ‘Are you not with ” (mentioning a well-known Canadian publisher.) The answer was:
‘“ No, Sir, and were it not for your unwarrantable intrusion I should be alone.”
Itis well known that the French are noted for momentary abstraction of
mind, and in this respect my friend is as
French as any man can be. To say that he has been unable to recall, once out of every twenty visits he has had the kind.
ness to pay me, where he had laid his hat, would be to say nothing very extraordinary, or is anything but what, from my acquaintance of him, Ï am not surptised at; but to mention that one day he would forget where he had put his right shoe (he invariably doffed his outer pedal.coverings when visiting), and the
next he would forget where his left slipper
“ Are vou h
Fe has ad been lying during the whole time of one of his Interviews and also I ;
sésnue Puzzle as to whether his coat Was to be but
r your un- front or at the bac
k : all the facts which, to use
à aré Xpressions,
raction of One d a h ay that Molière
d be alone.” Se are facts, —
| one of his technical I would affirm on Oath. ”
To say that once out of 1 the kindad laid his
what, from m not sur-
iat one day .
ad put his D
IZEnS and the disorde of his habiliments.
), and th This is the on!
| | Y Sort of abstrac left slippe think our barrister has not be e
; nd miry st -d his outer Fo
tion that n guilty
of, and this simply because he has never been known to be in a hurry. No coachman was or is ever able to please him, and so he leaves a vehicle almost before he has entered it; and chronicles say that he has never been seen driving but once, and that was on the occasion of the fu.
neral of a debtor’s near relative.
Speaking seriously, Mr. Willan is universally considered a great authority on
the Common Law of England in criminalk
cases and, indeed, in criminal procedure
generally, and is a great ‘“ stickler ” for
the generous and liberal maxims of ol
English jurisprudence which are rapidl
going out of favor.
During the Irish famine of 1847 th®
subject ofthts memoir published an elab
orate scheme of relief, by immigratia
s never o coachase him, st before s Say that but once, jf the fu
ss.
lan is uniithority on in criminal} procedure ickler ” foi ims of ol
are rapidi)
ed an elab
of 1847 th
immigr ati
from the mother country and settlement in Canada, which attracted great and favorable attention from the London press and many of the leading men both of England and Ireland, with whom he corresponded on the subject. Every portion of this scheme has since then, at different times and places, been put in successful operation.
More than a decade subsequently he Anade various suggestions for criminal law amendment, which now form portions of the Statute Law both of England and Canada. He also originated in court what snow a most important rule of practice n favor of destitute defendants. At the ame time he opposed many changes which mpairedthe characteristic ‘“‘individualism” f English jurisprudence and, in reference
) these, he gave the following account of
many changes in the ancient Anglo-Sax.
on aspect of that juridical system :
“ When the Whigs came into office, after Russell's Reform bill, having been long out of office, they carried with them a host of declaimers privileged to wear gowns and hungry for places. It was necessary to feed them in the Department of Justice. It was impossible to raise the capacity of these gentlemen to the level of the law, therefore it was resolved upon to reduce the law to the level of their incapacity. Hence we have the thing called law reform.” Mr. Willan was described on that occasion by no friendly critic as ‘having said in three minutes what other men were three hours trying
to say.”
€ EarL,. ”
glo-Sax-
to office, ing been vith them | to wear , It Was epartment o raise the , the level olved upon el of their the thing n was des o friendly 2e minutes
ours trying
ARL,
FABLE * pl
LE CHIEN, LE RENARD ET LE LAPIN He
Maître chien, sur l’herbe couché, noi Dormait sans crainte de dommage, dal Maître renard, sous un arbre caché, Guettait selon son vieil usage.
* Cette fable rappelle naturellement par sa forme celle du ard et du corbeau, mais comme il est aisé de s’en anercevoir, e s'en éloigne complètement par l’idée. Il va sans dire que je ai nullement la prétention de rivaliser avec l’immnortel fabuliste.