Eléments, chap. IV, aecL v, tub finem

102. Ed, Rev., n* LXXX, juillet 1824, DitpouU of Properiy by WiU, — EnlaUs. — French Law of Stuscession,

103. Westm. Rev., octobre 1824, article d'Austiu. — La question est aussitôt portée devant le Political Economy Club (2 mal 1825): 1. Has tbe French law of inheritance been injurions to the accumulation of wealth (J.-L. Mallet). — 2. Suppose the succession to property in any countr>' is not régula ted by any positive law, but that tbe succession to landed property is regulated by the custom of Primogeniture, whelher that is a good custom or not? (J. R. MacCnlloch).

104. Ed. Bev., n* LIX, juin 1818, art II, Rioardo'i Politioal Eomumy, p. 82. — n* LXXIX^ Mars 1824, art. I. RUe andFall of ProfUê, p. 30: c High rent and low profits, for they are inseparably connected, ought never to be made the subject of complaint, if they occur in the natnnl progress of Society, and uuder a System ot perféctly free intercooree with other nations... When... a rise of rent and a fall of profits take place in the natural course of thlngs and onder a System of perféctly Iree intercourae with other countries, Ihey sbould be submitted to wUboot murmuring, in as much as they resnlt from the opération oftbat gréai law of nature Avhose effects we bave endeavoured to trace and exhibit ».

105. Ed. Rev.y n» LXXXVIII, sept. 1826, art. II. Abolition of the Corn Laws, pp. 341 sqq. — Cf. West. /?«'., n» TF, avril 1825, art. VI. The Com Laws.