Les fr priétaire qu’à 14 et semences fai

sont roit

En.

i, Où pré-

hoses usage

À rente, p. 180.

à n'est alable

, 183.— , n°48, rnaud, priction, tion, n° priation, le Lan- — Petit 6, n°1.

Do, do, 1858, p.

Do, do, Maury, 0 Préjet IT, 1845, fet. des 1 Rec- Wolrer-

by the roperty, by the COYpora- Judah

riating, for the pCeSsarYy

3, Les formalités imposées par le statut pour l'ouverture d'un chemin et pour l’expropriation des particuliers doivent être suivies avec rigueur et à peine de nullité.— Doyon et La Corporation de St-Joseph, XVII L, C, à 193,

4, Under the provisions of the Quebec Railway Act, the lessees for 5 years of a stone quarry, With right of quarry and right to renow lease for another 5 years, are occupiers of such land and parties interested therein, entitled to compensation for damages caused by expropriation of the property for railway pur- 0868, Within the meaning of the Act. During the pendency of an action, in the nature of an action négatoire, by such lessees against the railway company, in consequence of the company and the arbitrators appointed under the Act to determine the compensation to be paid in consequence of the expropriation of the leased property refusing to admit the right of said lessees to be indemnifled under the Act, the plaintifis are entitled to a writ of injunction against the M company, in consequence of the company persisting in exercising their right of expropriation, without paying or offering to pay dame nity to the lessees.— Bourgouin & «7, vs The Montreal Northern Colonization Railway Company, XIX IL, C. J.,57.

5, Damage to rights of house owners in a city, such as “droits d'accès” to streets, does not constitute “eapropriation,” and gives no right to preliminary indemnity.— In France the depreciation caused to a house by stopping one end ofthe street on which it fronts is not an interference with a servitude, nor (standing alone) such direct and immediate damage as will give a title to indemait; : and, semble, the law in the province of Quebec is similar.— The Mayor & «1, of Montreal et Drummond, XXII L, C.J.,1.

6, The plaintiff complained that the defondants, a municipal corporation, had caused his fence to be taken down, and expropriated a part of his land for the urpose of changing the direction of a certain road, without having caused the tn to be valued by valuators.— Al, that the proceedings were irregular and must be set aside.— Deal vs Corporation of Philhpsburg, Q. L, D., p. 540, n° 683,

7. 1° Petitions for expropriatior under the Railway Act of 1869, must contain the description required by art. 2167 €. C.; 2° tho Commissioners of the Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa and Occidental Railway Company cannot in their own name exercise the right of'action. . The Railway being a publie work, this right is vestad in Her Majesty.— Ex parte The Commissioners of the Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa and Occidental Railway vs O’Neil and others, IV Q. L. R., 216,

408. La propriété d’une chose soit mobilière, soit immobilière, donne droit sur tout ce qu’elle produit, et sur ce qui s’y unit accessoirement, soit naturellement, soit artificiellement, Ce droit se nomme droit d’accession.

Î'L. 6, De adquirendo rerum.— L, 5, De rei vindicatione.— Pothier, Propriété, 5, 150,151 et 260.— Zbid., Introd, Cout., 100.—C, N.,546.