tome foi l'acheteur d clamer le vente ait eu
Juris défendeu digé que sa bonne meubles, XVIIL, » Whe wa third be maint Mathews 5, After bound to incapacity an appoal insolvent quence Of The guar the pui to be reira
4 A per «ate it afte third part;
5, The p defendants leased the from that and void, a \ordheime 6, La ver immeuble pas, OST UNE Roy et Dio
ou si le v
Troplong
une foire, tafiquant diquer sai
C, N., 228( à. Troplo 1682,— Cod
Jurisp.
and therefo the purch aright of p not the own
2 The pu hotel yard i wlling daily against the United Stat be sued in M
3 Une co
purchase from ndirectly, with étly in his own
y the author of batitution, is a legally become m,— Macintosh
from becoming le of, apply to CV L, C. F 249, unicipal, il n'a vs Corporation
posée, se porter rité de justice, —
ffiers, shérifs, uvent devenir ce du tribunal
d'un immeuble roit, mais annue
pas hors du uw une disposi-
t aliénable par la iséo à céder cotte
lion losses act est ce pour en opérer
saisissable par le
non-recevable à aisissabilité et la 5 — Borlinguet vs
au vendeur ct les qui suivent.
u vendeur, si
sur Part, 1
VENTE. 881 Jusisp.—1, Lo locataire d'un piano le vendit à un tiers, qui le revendit au défendeur, Sur une action en revendication, portée contre ce nouvel acquéreur, dé que le défendeur ne pouvait invoquer une possession de quelques mois et « bonne foi, comme titre contre les demandeurs, mais que pour prescrire des mebles, } ap uno possession de trois ans, de bonne foi.— Gould vx Cowan, VII L, ©. R.,46, Where a moveable has been lonsod by the owner and the lessee had sold it wa third party, an action en revendication by the lessor to recover it back will be maintained, although the possessor may have purchased in good faith.— Mathews vs Senécal, VII L, C, J., 222,
8, After the advertisement of writ of attachment in insolvoncy, the public is bound to know the incapacity of an insolvent to sell any of his property.— This incapacity continues and the publie is bound to know it, during the pendency of an appeal from a judgment which quashed the attachment.— À sale made by inolvent of property, even when not seized under the attachmunt, in consequence of its being then secreted, is absolutely null and not annulable only.— The guardian to the attachment under the writ ean revendicate in the hands the purchaser such at y when so sold.—"Tlie purchaser cannot claim to be reliabursed the price paid to insolvent.— Mallette & Whyte, XII LC, J,
4, A person who has leased a piano belonging to him, has a right to rovendiate it after it has beon sold by a third party to cover advances made by such third party to the lessee.— Nordheimer vs Fraser, I L. C, 1, J., 02,
5. The plaintifis revendicated a piano-forte which had been purchased by the dfendants at a judicial sale of the goods of a party to whom the plaintifis had lased the instrument, This sale was made by the bailiff in a diflerent district from that in which the instrument was soized : — Z/e4d, thht the sale was null and void, and could not convey any right of property as against the proprietors.—- Nordheimer & Duplessis, II L C, L J., 105,
6, La vente par laquelle une personne à par erreur vendu à un acheteur un immeuble qu'elle croyait lui appartenir, mais qui en réalité ne lui RENTRER pas, est une vente nulle, et le vendeur ne pourra pas rocouvrer le prix de vente.— Roy et Dion, VIII L, L., 259,
{{ss. [La vente est valide s’il s'agit d’une affaire commerciale, où si le vendeur devient ensuite propriétaire de la chose.]
Troplong, Vente, n° 236.— 6 Marcadé, p. 208.— Cadrès, loc. cit,
1489. Si une chose perdue ou volée est achetée de bonne foi dans une foire, marché, où à une vente publique, où d’un commerçant tafñiquant en semblables matières, le proprittaire ne peut la revendiquer sans remb: : ser à l’acheteur le prix qu’il en a payé.
€. N., 2280,.— Lamoignon, Arrétés, tit. 21, art. 96.— Pothier, Cheptels, n°° 45, 48 et ‘— Troplong, Vente, n° 42.— Merlin, Rép., v° Vol, soc. 4,4 1, n° 2.—C.C. Vaud, 1682,— Code civil B. C., art. 2268.
Jurisp.—1. Possession of moveables prosumes titleor right of property therein, and therefore, (except in cases of theft, violence, and perhaps accidental loss,) the purchaser of moveables, bona füle, in the usual course of trade, acquires aright of property in them, although they may have been sold by one who was not the owner thereof.— Fawcett & Thompson, VI L. C. J., 139,
2. The purchaser of a lost horse, bona fide, in the usual course of trade, in a hotel yard in Montreal, where horse dealers are in the habit of congregating and wlling daily a large number of horses, acquires no right of property therein as against the owner who lost it; and, although the purchaser be a resident of the United States and in possession there of the horse claimed, he may nevertheless le sued in Montreal for the value of the horse, on being personally served with process there.—Hughes vs Reed, VI L. C. J., 294.
3 Une cour d’hôtellerie où se font des encans de chevaux n’est pas considérée comme foire où marché dont il est parlé en Particle 1489 C. C.— Pour que l'acheteur de bonne foi, dans une de ces cours, d'un objet volé, ait droit de Kclamer le prix d’achat sur le propriétaire qui le revendique, il faut que cette vente ait eu lieu par vente publique et non privément.— Guy vs Booth, IV R.L,,
4, Where a horse was stolen and sold at publie auction, the purchaser y auction in good faith has no right or title to the horse, but must restore th same to the original owner, his only recourse being against the seller for recovery of the purchase money.—Langevin vs MeMillan, IX L. C, J., 105,
5, Notwithatanding anything contained in articles 1488 and 2268 of the Civil Code of Lower Canada, a valid sale or pledge cannot be made of stolen goods except in the cases mentioned in article 1489, «0 as to divest the real owner of his right to reclaim them from the purchaser or pledgee without reimbursing the price paid for or advances made on such goods, although the purchaser or pledgee may have bought or made advances on the stolen goods bona fide, in the ordinary course of his business.— The words “nor in commercial mattors generally ” in article 2268 do not protect a trader goaniring stolen goods in anv commercial transaction, whether from a trader dealing in similar articles or not, but apply, apparently, to cases where the possession of the goods is obtained in a commercial transaction, whether by sale or otherwise, but under the same
4 cireumstances by which a sale would be protected under article 1489,— Cansils
& Crawford, XXI L, C3. 1,
1490. Si la chose perdue ou volée a été vendue sous l’autoritéde la loi, elle ne peut être revendiquée.
