SOCIETE.—DEMANDE INCIDENTE

Cour SUPÉRIEURE, Montréal, 17 décembre 1872.

Présent : MACKkAY, J.

CossETTE vs ARCHER et ul.

Jugé: Qu'un membre d’une société défenderesse qui plaide seul, et qui par une demande incidente réclame des deniers dus par le dernandeur à la société, sera débouté de sa demande incidente sur réponse en droit.

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff, a widow, sues to have radié a mortgage on a vessel, alleging that the debt was paid by her late husband. The firm of Archer, Labelle & Co. consisting of three partners, is sued. Archer alone contests and puts in an incidental demand for moneys alleged to be due the firm by pluintiff. A demurrer is pleaded to this on the ground that Archer alone cannot claim money said to be due the firm. The demurrer is well founded, and must be maintained, and the incidental demand dismissed. (4 R. L, 461).

DUHAMEL & RAINVILLE, for plaintiff.

PERKINS & MonK, for Archer.