TOME XXIV

hnpunity, is thereby allowed the opposant ; he is merely allowed an opportunity of proving the truth of his allegation relative to the intrinsie nullity of the writ of vendiliont cr. ponus itself, or the irregularity of the proceedings thereupon. For those reasons, LT 'concur in the judgment of the Court, and Lam of opinion that the judgment of the Court below should be reversed.

Judgment of the Superior Court reversed accordingly. (10 D..J, B. C., p. 333

ANDERSON and PARKIN, for appellants,

ALLEYN, R, for respondent.